Submissions are being called on for the new
Intelligence and Security Bill – but we say it is time to draw a line in the sand. The
unrelenting expansion of the NZ Intelligence Community must be stopped.
A brief over-view of the last few years
shows how relentless the changes have been:
Since 2007 the NZ SIS Act has been amended
a half a dozen times. In 2011 the Video
Surveillance Bill became law; a year later the Search and Surveillance Bill
was passed. This was followed in 2013 by two changes: the TICS Bill (the
Telecommunications Interception Capability and Security) and the GCSB and
Related Legislation Amendment Bill, a Bill passed by two votes. At the end
of 2014 the Countering
Terrorist Fighters Legislation Bill became law.
There has also been a seemingly
never-ending series of reports, reviews and a concerted PR blitz:
In 2009 there was the Murdoch
Report of the SIS, GCSB and EAB. In 2011 Pipitea
House was opened enabling most of the NZ intelligence community to operate
under one roof and thus uniting the intelligence culture. In 2012 Paul
Neazor reported on GCSB spying in relation to the Dotcom saga, this was
followed in March 2013 with the Kitteridge
Report on the GCSB and then in 2014 the State
Sector Review of the intelligence community was released. In 2015 the Cullen and Reddy
Intelligence Review began and there was a lot of talk of ‘Jihadi Brides’.
Now, in 2016, we have the Security
Intelligence Bill, and also the review
of the Search and Surveillance Act. As soon as people finish submissions on
the Security Intelligence Bill, the next round will begin on the Search
and Surveillance Act.
We say it is time to say stop the spying.
We do not need an expansion of the intelligence communities’ powers. As the UN
Rapporteur in May 2016 said, the NZ government had ‘no case for more
surveillance’.
But the reality is that this Bill will
become law.
In 2013 many of us wrote submissions and thousands of us took to
the streets to oppose the GCSB Bill, and we lost. That law was passed with a two-person majority. We know
that, with only be a few token changes to the Security Intelligence Bill, this
new law will be passed, too.
The reality is that unless
the opposition parties vote against it, the Bill will be passed.
Submissions may result in a few changes in the Bill but the key aims of the
Bill will be passed: the Bill will bring the Security Intelligence Service
(SIS) and Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) under one unifying
law and remove all restrictions
against the GCSB spying on New Zealanders.
You may choose to write a submission on the
Bill, but also call upon the parties in opposition to oppose the Bill. Currently,
both the Labour Party and Māori Party support it.
Contact them and tell them not to support the Bill – rather than engaging in debate
with the government about the 107 recommendations of the review, what is needed
is debate on surveillance and its role in society.
Contact both Labour and Māori members of parliament and their electorate offices now:
Maori Party emails:
TeUruroa.Flavell@parliament.govt.nz, Marama.FoxMP@parliament.govt.nz, MaoriParty@parliament.govt.nz, MPWaiariki@parliament.govt.nz, MPFlavell@parliament.govt.nz
Labour Party emails:
andrew.little@parliament.govt.nz,
a.king@parliament.govt.nz,
office@grantrobertson.co.nz,
grant.robertson@parliament.govt.nz,
haurakiwaikato@parliament.govt.nz,
nanaia.mahuta@parliament.govt.nz,
phil.twyford@parliament.govt.nz,
chris.hipkins@parliament.govt.nz,
chris.hipkins@parliament.govt.nz,
carmel.sepuloni@parliament.govt.nz,
kelvin.davis@parliament.govt.nz,
jacinda@jacinda.co.nz,
jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz,
david.clark@parliament.govt.nz,
MangereMP@parliament.govt.nz,
sua.william.sio@parliament.govt.nz,
palmerston.north@parliament.govt.nz,
iain.lees-galloway@parliament.govt.nz,
megan.woods@wigram.org.nz,
megan.woods@parliament.govt.nz,
NewLynnMP@parliament.govt.nz,
david.cunliffe@parliament.govt.nz,
info@mtalbertlabour.co.nz,
david.shearer@parliament.govt.nz,
phil.goff@parliament.govt.nz,
wainui.eo@parliament.govt.nz,
petone.eo@parliament.govt.nz,
trevor.mallard@parliament.govt.nz,
porthills.mp@parliament.govt.nz,
ruth.dyson@parliament.govt.nz,
damien.oconnor@parliament.govt.nz,
clayton.cosgrove.mp@parliament.govt.nz, suemoroneymp@parliament.govt.nz,
sue.moroney@parliament.govt.nz,
dunedin.southmp@parliament.govt.nz,
clare.curran@parliament.govt.nz,
mana.electorate@parliament.govt.nz,
kris.faafoi@parliament.govt.nz,
: louisa.wall@parliament.govt.nz,
stuart.nashmp@parliament.govt.nz,
stuart.nash@parliament.govt.nz,
murihiku.tetaitonga@parliament.govt.nz, TeTaiTonga.Otautahi@parliament.govt.nz, tetauihu.tetaitonga@parliament.govt.nz,
poneke.tetaitonga@parliament.govt.nz,
rino.tirikatene@parliament.govt.nz,
tairawhiti@parliament.govt.nz,
tematauamaui@parliament.govt.nz,
meka.whaitiri@parliament.govt.nz,
poto.williams@parliament.govt.nz,
peeni.labour@labour.org.nz,
adrian.rurawhe@labour.org.nz,
jenny.salesa@parliament.govt.nz
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.